Epoch TOPICS CONTEXTS PERSPECTIVES ACTIVITIES METHODS FIGURES HELP TIME LINE Acknowledgements ACTIVITY 3 Exploring persepctives ACTIVITY 1 Using the timeline ACTIVITY 2 Using the biographies ACTIVITY 5 Using the figures, methods, perspectives, topics and context icons ACTIVITY 4 Exploring Topics Ainsworth Allport Baddeley Baron-Cohen Asperger Asch Binet Bartlett Bilig Belbin Bowlby Bruce Buss Cattell Ceci Byrne Bruner Bryant Cohen Cosmides Chomsky Cooper Charcot Conway Damasio Darwin Costa Dawkins Csikszentmihalyi Crick Erikson Eysenck Ekman Descartes Ebbinghaus Dennet Frith Freud Anna Freud Sigmund Falschung Fodor Festinger Goffman Gibson Goodall Galton Goldberg Gathercole Gregory Humphrey James Heider Janet Goodman Kahneman Lazarus Jung Kanner Klein Kelly Mayo McCrae Luria Loftus Lorenz Maslow Neisser Norman Morton Milgram Milner Mead Potter Plomin Piaget Pinker Penfield Pavlov Tajfel Sperry Skinner Saywitz Spears Rogers Triesman Turner Tulving Tooby Taylor Thorndike Weiskrantz Vrij Aldert Warrington Watson Vygotsky Tversky Wundt Zimbardo Whiten Wetherell You can check your answers against ours You can check your answers against ours You can check your answers against ours You can check your answers against ours You can check your answers against ours

Map Node Icon: DAMASIO.jpg Damasio url anchor

Views:  FIGURES, TIME LINE

Reference Node Icon: DAMASIO.jpg  url anchor

Note Node Damasio, Antonio url anchor

Reference Node Icon: red-16.png Mind Body url anchor

Mind/body problem. The issue of how the mind and body relate is one of the perennial underlying questions, not just for psychology, but philosophy, neuroscience and biology also. The essential 'problem' arises because of the division often made in our culture between the 'mind' (or mental processes) and the 'body' (assumed to be physically based). The assumption is often made that mind and body are quite distinct and separate processes (or entities) - a dualism that goes back centuries to Descartes (and, indeed, thousands of years earlier to the Ancient Greek philosopher Plato). Once this 'dualistic' viewpoint is taken, the problem then becomes, 'how can such separate entities/processes influence each other?'. Several approaches retain the 'dualistic' assumption of a separate mind and body. One of these is the philosophy of interactionism. This assumes that mind and body are quite distinct, but interact with each other. So, for example, the mind can instruct the body to raise an arm; similarly, if the body ingests alcohol, this will produce a corresponding affect on the mind. Other solutions involve denying there is any fundamental duality involved, and instead saying that there is only one fundamental entity. This is called monism, and it practice it means either the view that only the physical world is 'real' (materialism), or the view that the fundamental reality is a mental or spiritual one (idealism). An alternative solution sees the mind/body problem as essentially linguistic, stemming from the different ways we label different characteristics of the same entity. url anchor
Views:  TOPICS, Damasio, Crick, Descartes, Dennet, Fodor, Humphrey, Penfield, Sperry

Reference Node Icon: red-16.png Neuropsychological basis of the mind url anchor

Neuropsychological basis of the mind/consciousness. Neuropsychology examines how neurological processes in the brain affect both behaviour and the experience of consciousness. This involves studying the brain, for example by examining the structure of the brain and the corresponding neural activity within it. Another approach is to examine damaged brains, looking at the consequences of the damage for behaviour, perception and language. Many cognitive functions have specific centres in the brain, though some cannot be localised in this way, and attention has turned instead to the identification of networks of interacting brain areas. url anchor
Views:  TOPICS, Conway, Damasio, Eysenck, Frith, Luria, Milner, Sperry, Weiskrantz, Warrington

Note Node Antonio R. Damasio (b.1944, Lisbon, Portugal; M.D and PhD, University of Lisbon, 1969, 1974) is currently, Damasio M. W. Van Allen Professor and head of the Department of Neurology at the University of Iowa. His research in cognitive neuroscience has focused on large-scale neural systems and their role in mental function. Through his 'semantic marker' hypothesis, he draws an intimate connection between emotion and cognition. url anchor

Note Node He is renowned for “the medical mysteries he's solved through decades spent tracking amnesiacs down hospital corridors, waiting for comatose patients to awaken, and studying PET scans to piece together the puzzle of consciousness.” Source: University of Iowa Alumni Association.  url anchor

Note Node His research on patients with frontal lobe damage, reviewed in his book Descartes' Error (1994), indicates that covert signals or overt feelings normally accompany response options and operate as a bias to assist knowledge and logic in the process of choice. His book The Feeling of What Happens has been a popular success. url anchor

Note Node Written by Course Team url anchor

Top