Chapter 8

Infrastructure for Navigating Interdisciplinary Debates: Critical Decisions for Representing Argumentation

Robert E. Horn
Stanford University, USA and Saybrook Graduate School, USA


Figures
(enlargements/colour versions of reduced/black and white figures in the book)

	Figure 8.1: This is one of seven maps in the Mapping Great Debates: Can Computers Think? Series. Reproduced by permission of MacroVU Press. <www.macrovu.com>
	Figure 8.8: The top level window of the Mapping Great Debates series on Genetically Modified Food.
	Figure 8.9: The vertical format of the Mapping Great Debates series on Genetically Modified Food.
	Figure 8.10: The top level of the Mapping Great Debates series on Consciousness.
	Figure 8.11. The vertical format of the Mapping Great Debates series on CONSCIOUSNESS.

Cited References/Websites

Hartley, J. and Trueman, M., ( 1983) The effects of headings in text on recall, search and retrieval. British Jounral of Educational Psychology, 53, 205-214.

Horn, R. E. (1989) Mapping Hypertext. Lexington, MA: The Lexington Institute.

Horn, R. E. (1992a) How high can it fly? Examining the evidence on information mapping's method of high performance communication. Lexington, MA: The Lexington Institute.

Horn, R. E. (1992b) Clarifying two controversies about information mapping's method, Educational and Training Technology International, 2, 29, 109-117.

Horn, R. E., (1993, February). Structured writing at twenty five. Performance and Instruction, 11-17.

Horn, R. E., (1995). Structured writing as a paradigm. In A. Romiszowski & C. Dills (Eds.), Instructional development: State of the art. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Horn, R. E. (1998a). Mapping great debates: Can computers think? 7 maps and Handbook. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU. Available from http://www.macrovu.com

Horn, R. E. (1998b). Visual language: global communication for the 21st Century. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU.

Horn, R. E. (1998c). Using argumentation analysis to examine history and status of a major debate in artificial intelligence and philosophy. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & Willard, C. A. (Eds.) Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the international society for study of argumentation, 375-381.

Horn, R. E. (2000, Fall). Teaching philosophy with argumentation maps. American philosophical association newsletter on teaching philosophy, 153-159

Reid, F., & Wright, P. (1973). Written Information: Some alternatives to prose for expressing the outcomes of complex contingencies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2), 160-166

Thomas, L. (1981, July). Debating the unknowable. Atlantic Monthly, 49-50.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S, Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1979). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.

Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59, 434-460.

Wagner, E. (1998). Personal communication. Available from http://www.macrovu.com