Chapter 1

The Roots of Computer Supported Argument Visualization

Simon Buckingham Shum
Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK


Figures
(enlargements/colour versions of reduced/black and white figures in the book)

Figure 1.4: Screens from the gIBIS (graphical-IBIS) hypertext system to support design and policy deliberation. This example illustrates the support the tool provided for collapsing portions of a large IBIS map (a), into an aggregate node (b). Reprinted from Begeman and Conklin (1988), courtesy of BYTE <www.byte.com>

Cited References/Websites

Aleven, V., & Ashley, K. D. (1994). An instructional environment for practising argumentation skills. AAAI'94: Proceedings of Annual Conferrence American Assoc. Artificial Intelligence, 485-492. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Ed.). (in press). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Baker, M.J. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In J. Andriessen & P. Coier (Eds.) Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.

Begeman, M. and Conklin, J. (1988). The right tool for the right job. BYTE, Oct. 1988.

Bench-Capon, T. J. M., Leng, P. H., & Stanford, G. (1998). A computer supported environment for the teaching of legal argument. The Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 3. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from <http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/98-3/capon.html

Bootstrap Institute. Available from <http://www.bootstrap.org

Brown, J. S. (1986). From cognitive ergonomics to social ergonomics and beyond. In D. Norman & S. Draper (Ed.), User Centered System Design (pp. 457-486). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brown/MIT (1995). Brown/MIT Bush Symposium. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://www.cs.brown.edu/memex/

Buckingham Shum, S., & Hammond, N. (1994). Argumentation-Based design rationale: What use at what cost? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(4), 603-652.

Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm

Buzan, T. (1974). Use your head. London: BBC.

Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20(9), 17-41.

Conklin, J., & Begeman, M. L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 4(6), 303-331.

CSILE: Computer Supported Intentional Learning Environment. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://csile.oise.utoronto.ca/

Diagrammatic Reasoning (2002). Gateway to the diagrammatic reasoning website. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://www.hcrc.ed.ac.uk/gal/Diagrams/

Eastgate Systems: Storyspace. Available from http://www.eastgate.com

Engelbart, D. C. (1962). Augmenting human intellect: A conceptual framework (SRI Project No. 3578, Summary Report AFOSR-3233). Stanford Research Institute. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://sloan.stanford.edu/mousesite/EngelbartPapers/
B5_F18_ConceptFrameworkInd.html

Engelbart, D. C. (1963). A conceptual framework for the augmentation of man’s intellect. In P. Howerton & D. Weeks (Eds.), Vistas in information handling (pp. 1-29). Washington, DC: Spartan Books.

Fischer, G., Lemke, A. C., McCall, R., & Morch, A. I. (1991). Making Argumentation Serve Design. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3&4), 393-419.

Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N. H., & Chandrasekaran, B. (Ed.). (1995). Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Greif, I (ed.) (1988). Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, California.

Grudin, J. (1994). Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 92-105.

Halasz, F. G., Moran, T. P., & Trigg, R. H. (1987). NoteCards in a nutshell. Proceedings of CHI and GI’87: Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphic Interface, 45-52. New York: ACM.

Horn, R. (1989). Mapping hypertext: The analysis, organization, and display of knowledge for the next generation of on-line text and graphics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Institute.

Horn, R. (1998). Visual language: Global communication for the 21st century. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU, Inc.

Knowledge Forum. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://www.learn.motion.com/lim/kf/KF0.html

Kolb, D. (1994). Socrates in the Labyrinth: Hypertext, Argument, Philosophy (A Hypertext). Watertown: Eastgate Systems. http://www.eastgate.com

Kolb, D. (1997). Scholarly hypertext: Self-represented complexity. Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Hypertext, (Southampton), 29-37. Retrieved on August 1, 2002 from http://journals.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lac/ht97/pdfs/kolb.pdf

Lee, J. (1991). Extending the Potts and Bruns model for recording design rationale. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering, 114-125. New York: IEEE-ACM.

MacLean, A. Bellotti, V. and Buckingham Shum, S. (1993). Developing the design space with design space analysis. In P. F. Byerley, P. J. Barnard, and J. May (Eds.). Computers, Communication and Usability: Design issues, research and methods for integrated services. (North Holland Series in Telecommunication) pp.197-219. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

MacLean, A., Young, R. M., Bellotti, V., & Moran, T. (1991). Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3, 4), 201-250.