Skeptic Arguments and What the Science Says Claims about adaptation Claims about IPCC Claims about the sun Claims about other planets Claims about greenhouse gas Claims about climategate Claims about consensus Claims about temperature data Claims about predictions Claims about oceans Claims about Greenland Claims about cooling Claims about historical precedent Miscellaneous claims Claims about sea level rise Claims about other effects Learn more about debate mapping Claims about CO2 missing citation Polar regions no reference given no citation Volcano related Human related

Map Node  Claims about greenhouse gas url anchor

Question Node  What are the greenhouse gas arguments/ url anchor

Answer Node  Water vapor in the stratosphere stopped global warming url anchor

Tags:  water vapor, stratosphere

Pro Node  Thus rather than a "doomsday" cycle of runaway warming, Mother Earth appears surprisingly tolerant of carbon, decreasing atmospheric levels of water vapor -- a more effective greenhouse gas -- to compensate. url anchor

A new study authored by Susan Solomon, lead author of the study and a researcher at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colo. could explain why atmospheric carbon is not contributing to warming significantly. According to the study, as carbon levels have risen, the cold air at high altitudes over the tropics has actually grown colder. The lower temperatures at this "coldest point" have caused global water vapor levels to drop, even as carbon levels rise. Water vapor helps trap heat, and is a far the strongest of the major greenhouse gases, contributing 36–72 percent of the greenhouse effect. However more atmospheric carbon has actually decreased water vapor levels. Thus rather than a "doomsday" cycle of runaway warming, Mother Earth appears surprisingly tolerant of carbon, decreasing atmospheric levels of water vapor -- a more effective greenhouse gas -- to compensate. url anchor
Tags:  ational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Susan Solomon
Reference Node  http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=17553 url anchor
Reference: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=17553

Con Node  This possibility just means that future global warming could be even worse. url anchor

Reference Node  http://www.skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-stratosphere-global-warming.htm url anchor
Reference: http://www.skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-stratosphere-global-warming.htm

Map Node  Claims about CO2 url anchor

Answer Node  Water vapor is the most powerful greenhouse gas url anchor

Tags:  greenhouse gas, water vapor

Con Node  Rising CO2 increases atmospheric water vapor, which makes global warming much worse url anchor

Tags:  global warming, water vapor, rising, co2
Reference Node  http://www.skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm url anchor
Reference: http://www.skepticalscience.com/water-vapor-greenhouse-gas.htm

Pro Node  Water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas.  url anchor

Water vapour is the most important greenhouse gas. If you get a fall evening and the sky is clear, heat will escape, the temperature will drop. If there's cloud cover, the heat is trapped by water vapour and the temperature stays warm. If you go to In Salah in southern Algeria, they recorded at noon 52°C. By midnight, it's -3.6°C. It's caused because there is very little water vapour in the atmosphere and is a demonstration of water vapour as the most important greenhouse gas. url anchor
Reference Node  http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/864 url anchor
Reference: http://www.fcpp.org/publication.php/864
Tags:  Tim Ball

Answer Node  Greenhouse effect has been falsified url anchor

Tags:  greenhouse effect

Pro Node  The influence of so-called greenhouse gases on near-surface temperature - is not yet absolutely proven.  url anchor

The influence of so-called greenhouse gases on near-surface temperature - is not yet absolutely proven. In other words, there is as yet no incontrovertible proof either of the greenhouse effect, or its connection with alleged global warming. This is no surprise, because in fact there is no such thing as the greenhouse effect: it is an impossibility. The statement that so-called greenhouse gases, especially CO2, contribute to near-surface atmospheric warming is in glaring contradiction to well-known physical laws relating to gas and vapour, as well as to general caloric theory. url anchor
Tags:  greenhouse gas, co2
Reference Node  http://realplanet.eu/error.htm url anchor
Reference: http://realplanet.eu/error.htm
Note Node  not the original link url anchor

Con Node  The greenhouse effect is standard physics and confirmed by observations url anchor

Tags:  standard physics, Temperature data
Reference Node  http://www.skepticalscience.com/does-greenhouse-effect-exist.htm url anchor
Reference: http://www.skepticalscience.com/does-greenhouse-effect-exist.htm

Answer Node  It's methane url anchor

Tags:  methane

Pro Node  A United Nations report has identified the world's rapidly growing herds of cattle as the greatest threat to the climate, forests and wildlife.  url anchor

A United Nations report has identified the world's rapidly growing herds of cattle as the greatest threat to the climate, forests and wildlife. Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together. Burning fuel to produce fertiliser to grow feed, to produce meat and to transport it - and clearing vegetation for grazing - produces 9 per cent of all emissions of carbon dioxide, the most common greenhouse gas. And their wind and manure emit more than one third of emissions of another, methane, which warms the world 20 times faster than carbon dioxide. url anchor
Tags:  cattle, livestock
Map Node  missing citation url anchor

Con Node  Methane plays a minor role in global warming but could get much worse if permafrost starts to melt. url anchor

Tags:  perafrost, methane
Reference Node  http://www.skepticalscience.com/methane-and-global-warming.htm url anchor
Reference: http://www.skepticalscience.com/methane-and-global-warming.htm

Answer Node  The science isn't settled url anchor

Con Node  That human CO2 is causing global warming is known with high certainty & confirmed by observations url anchor

Reference Node  http://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm url anchor
Reference: http://www.skepticalscience.com/settled-science.htm

Pro Node  Many people think the science of climate change is settled. It isn't.  url anchor

Many people think the science of climate change is settled. It isn't. And the issue is not whether there has been an overall warming during the past century. There has, although it was not uniform and none was observed during the past decade. The geologic record provides us with abundant evidence for such perpetual natural climate variability, from icecaps reaching almost to the equator to none at all, even at the poles. The climate debate is, in reality, about a 1.6 watts per square metre or 0.5 per cent discrepancy in the poorly known planetary energy balance. url anchor
Reference Node  http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/climate-change-science-isnt-settled/story-e6frg6zo-1225702894631 url anchor
Reference: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/climate-change-science-isnt-settled/story-e6frg6zo-1225702894631
Top