Nuclear Power debate: Why greens must learn to love nuclear power 19 September 08- from Mark Lynas Blog (http://www.marklynas.org/2008/9/19/why-greens-must-learn-to-love-nuclear-power) Explore the debate by question General Debate: Going Nuclear? Summarize the main arguments for nuclear power: Explore conections between issues How about nuclear power s potential contribution to mitigating global warming? How are we going to provide for our energy needs in a way that does not destroy, via global warming, the capacity of our planet to support life? How long high-level waste from reactors remains dangerous? What about the waste that nuclear reactors produce? What if a new generation of nuclear plants could be designed that, instead of producing more waste to leave as a toxic legacy for our grandchildren, actually generated energy by burning up existing waste stockpiles? Why does the nuclear issue evoke very strong reactions? Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest? Why, given the purported advantages in safety and fuel use, have fast-breeders not been developed commercially? Are those who care about global warming prepared to reconsider their opposition to nuclear power in this new era? Mappa ridotta

Map Node Icon: issue.png Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest? url anchor

Tags:  Mark Lynas, Nuclear Power, Energy production
Views: Explore the debate by question, General Debate: Going Nuclear?, Summarize the main arguments for nuclear power: Explore conections between issues, Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest?

Map Node Icon: issue.png Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest? url anchor

Tags:  Mark Lynas, Nuclear Power, Energy production
Views: Explore the debate by question, General Debate: Going Nuclear?, Summarize the main arguments for nuclear power: Explore conections between issues, Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest?

Answer Node MacKay calculates that even if we covered the windiest 10 per cent of the UK with wind turbines, put solar panels on all south-facing roofs, implemented strong energy efficiency measures across the economy, built offshore wind turbines across an area of sea two-thirds the size of Wales, and fully exploited every other conceivable source of renewables (including wave and tidal power), energy production would still not match current consumption(13). url anchor

This is rather different to Britain being the -Saudi Arabia of wind power- as many in the environmental movement are fond of asserting. Indeed, MacKay concludes that we will need to import renewable electricity from other countries Ð primarily from solar farms in the North African desert Ð or choose nuclear, or both. Indeed, it is vital to stress the neither I nor MacKay nor any credible expert suggests a choice between renewables and nuclear: the sensible conclusion is that we need both, soon, and on a large scale if we are to phase out coal and other fossil fuels as rapidly as the climate needs. As MacKay told me: -We need to get building- url anchor
Tags:  Mark Lynas, Nuclear Power, Energy production
Views: General Debate: Going Nuclear?, Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest?

Reference Node David McKay-Sustainable Energy Ð without the hot air..pdf url anchor

Reference: David McKay-Sustainable Energy Ð without the hot air..pdf
Tags:  Mark Lynas, Nuclear Power, Energy production
Views: General Debate: Going Nuclear?, Why not ditch nuclear and focus only on renewables, as the greens suggest?
Top